I’m voting “Yes” on Question 1 because Greenfield deserves transparency, accountability, and a firm plan — not vague promises and shifting narratives.

The City Council’s decision to “surplus” the Hope Street parking lot blindsided our community. There was little public discussion, and many abutters felt betrayed. For over 50 years, this lot has served local businesses and offices. Now we’re told it’s expendable — without a feasibility study, without a cost analysis, and without a clear plan.

First, the mayor said the goal was market-rate housing. Then she admitted it might need to be affordable housing. Which is it? Meanwhile, nonprofit developers will call the shots, and taxpayers will foot the bill. Greenfield already carries $294 million in tax-exempt property. How much more can we absorb?

Our infrastructure is strained. The sewer plant is over capacity. The water moratorium speaks volumes. If the state wants Greenfield to do more, it must do more for Greenfield. Our community has been a leader in supporting those in need. It’s time the state acknowledged our efforts — with resources to upgrade our infrastructure.

We’ve repurposed buildings before — the Weldon Hotel, Millers Falls Tools — creating 220 housing units. Let’s explore options like the Kennametal site or Miles Street warehouse before selling off vital downtown land. That will take strong, stable leadership.

This isn’t “people vs. cars.” It’s about thoughtful planning, fiscal responsibility, and respect for those who rely on accessible downtown services — like the hundreds who visit the Justice Center and Department of Mental Health every week. 

Last summer, 11 people voted to sell 1 acre of land on Hope Street. Now it’s time to widen that discussion. This referendum vote on Question 1 gives all voters the right to weigh in. After all, this land is our land.

What should we do with Hope Street? More retail? What kind of “affordable”housing? Let’s hit the reset button, and get broader agreement about what we hope for Greenfield. Let’s reach  higher ground. We can be more creative than just housing vs. parking. Vote “Yes” on Question 1.

John F. Merrigan

Greenfield