As a resident of Stone Farm Lane, I strongly oppose the proposed 22-unit condominium complex plus 12 additional units planned on the grounds that it is far too large for the space and quiet, rural neighborhood. Despite repeated outreach to city officials, the developers, and the Valley Community Land Trust, our neighborhood concerns remain unaddressed.
Stone Farm Lane is a low-density cul-de-sac with a single point of access. This zoning limits housing density for good reasons: to protect neighborhood character, avoid overburdening infrastructure, and ensure safety. This project threatens all of that. There has been no road assessment or traffic study. Water and sewer systems are old and cannot support the increased demand. A pumping station would bring noise pollution to this peaceful area. The parking plan only provides one spot per unit with no overflow, which will worsen the congestion. The plan also fails to seriously consider the environmental impact. The property borders the Connecticut River and includes sensitive wetlands and habitats, which are vital to flood control, wildlife, and the natural ecosystem. Yet the design has not changed in response to these concerns.
As butters, we have legal rights to be notified, to object, and to appeal developments that threaten our safety, environment, and property values. These are not optional; they are protections built into the law. This project lacks full transparency and public engagement. More troubling, a Planning Board member and Conservation Commission member have had personal involvement in the project. This compromises public trust and undermines the integrity of the approval process, which raises ethical questions.
Ultimately, this development will not address Greenfield’s affordable housing shortage, which was how this project was originally introduced to the community. A more appropriate solution would be to build 2-3 two-family homes, like those that already exist there. I urge local leaders to reject this project as proposed. Our community deserves thoughtful planning that respects the land, the law, and the people who live here. It’s time for local government to engage the community they serve regarding development before residents start asking if it’s time to stay or go.
Lisa Guilbault
Greenfield